NLang is deadborn

My proposal for a new data description language NLang alternative to RDF is probably deadborn.

I have missed the rationale:

The rationale for NLang was that the data is not messed up when loading information from several files.

But today I’ve realized that I can just write RDF software in such a way that information from several files that they won’t intermix.

So I can continue my work with traditional RDF. There is no real need to create that fancy NLang.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.